Archive for Law

San Diego Foreclosures For Sale

Today, everywhere you look, there are commercials, billboards and roadside signs by entities offering to help you prevent a foreclosure of your home. Known as Foreclosure Consultants, some, if not many of these services and the persons whom they employ may be acting in violation of the strict regulations in California which regulate this growing industry. Others, may be outright frauds and scam artists.

 

The focus of these foreclosure consultants is anyone who is behind on their mortgage payments, which is now estimated to encompass one out of every ten homeowners. However, those who seek to defraud the public have their focus especially on the elderly, the newly unemployed, those whose properties are entering foreclosure and those whose payments have recently spiked upwards.

 

If you’ve been the victim anywhere in Southern California of real estate fraud or the target of an unscrupulous loan modification service, foreclosure consultant or someone acting on your behalf to modify your mortgage or cure your problems who is in violation of the strict regulations discussed in this article, call the Law Offices of R. Sebastian Gibson at any of the numbers on our website at http://www.SebastianGibsonLaw.com .

 

If you are a licensed real estate broker or agent and have either been wrongly accused of being in violation of the laws and regulations governing loan modification services and foreclosure consultants, or acted as such without being aware of these strict regulations and need legal defense, we urge you to call us at any of the numbers which you can find on our website.

 

To help you wade through the regulations in California on such services, here are some of the most important regulations. Keep in mind, that there is some overlap between foreclosure consultants and loan modification services. For that reason, the laws and regulations governing both services are included.

 

California Civil Code Section 2945 regulates foreclosure consultants. There is an additional requirement with respect to loan modification services, as discussed below. As with many code sections, the restrictions are complex and many. But here are the primary ways in which foreclosure consultants and loan modification services are regulated.

 

First, no foreclosure consultant and no real estate licensee is allowed to collect any advance fees for services as a foreclosure consultant once a Notice of Default has been recorded against your property. California lawyers are exempt from this prohibition.

 

Second, even if a Notice of Default has not been recorded against your property, in order for a real estate broker to assist you in obtaining a loan modification, or to otherwise negotiate a possible resolution to your problem, the broker must have you sign an agreement that specifically states what services will be performed, when they will be performed and how much you must pay.

 

Third, a broker may not have you sign any such loan modification agreement until it has been submitted to the Department of Real Estate for review and the broker has received permission from the DRE to use it and collect an advance fee.

 

Fourth, licensed real estate brokers who provide loan modification services without collecting fees in advance are not required to receive the DRE’s permission so long as their services are fully completed before they are paid by you.

 

Fifth, foreclosure consultant contract must allow the homeowner the right to cancel the contract until midnight of the third business day as defined in Section 1689.5 of the California Civil Code.

 

Sixth, foreclosure consultant contracts must provide an additional notice to the homeowner in 14-point boldface type stating when fees can be taken and notifying the homeowner that the consultant cannot ask you to sign any lien, deed of trust or deed.

 

Seventh, it is a violation for the foreclosure consultant to claim, demand, charge, collect, or receive any compensation until after the consultant has performed each and every service the consultant contracted or represented he or she would perform.

 

Eighth, it is a violation for the foreclosure consultant to charge any fee or interest which exceeds ten percent per annum of the amount of any loan which the foreclosure consultant may make to the owner.

 

Ninth, it is also a violation for the foreclosure consultant to take any wage assignment, consideration from any third party, acquire any interest in the residence in question, take any power of attorney, induce the owner to sign other contracts which are not in compliance, or enter into an agreement to assist the owner to obtain surplus funds prior to 65 days after the trustee’s sale has been conducted.

 

Tenth, an action may be brought against a foreclosure consultant for any of these violations and judgment shall include actual damages, reasonable attorney’s fees and costs, equitable relief and exemplary damage of at least three times the compensation received by the foreclosure consultant. The foreclosure consultant may also be punished by a fine of up to $25,000.00 or imprisonment for up to a year or both for each violation.

 

The reason for these regulations are many. Foreclosure consultants have, in many cases, been found to charge high fees, require the payment to be secured by a deed of trust on the residence, and then have either performed no service or worthless services. Some foreclosure consultants have then been known to purchase the homes at a fraction of their worth shortly before the homeowner loses their home.

 

Additionally, some foreclosure consultants have required payment of exorbitant fees for services such as to obtain the remaining funds from a foreclosure sale when the homeowner could have obtained those remaining funds from the trustee of a trustee’s sale directly for minimal cost if the homeowner had sufficient time to receive notices from the trustee regarding how and where to make a claim for excess proceeds under Civil Code Section 2924j.

 

Among the services foreclosure consultants are known to offer, legitimate or otherwise, are to stop or postpone foreclosure sales, obtain forbearances from beneficiaries and mortgage companies, assist in getting reinstated, obtain extensions of time, obtain waivers of acceleration clauses, assist in obtaining loans and advances, avoiding or ameliorating the impairment of the owner’s credit, saving the home from foreclosure, and assisting in obtaining the remaining proceeds from the foreclosure of the residence. If a foreclosure consultant promises any of these services, he or she is bound by Civil Code Section 2945 discussed above.

 

If you are dealing with a loan modification service, even one with a contract which has been submitted to the DRE and the broker has received permission to use it and collect an advance fee, if the real estate broker does not follow the strict procedures for handling the advance fee as contained in California Business & Professions Code Section 10146, the agent will be presumed to have violated Sections 506 and 506a of the Penal Code and the homeowner may recover treble damages for amounts misapplied and shall also be entitled to reasonable attorney fees in any action to recover those amounts.

 

Representatives of foreclosure consultants must be bonded real estate licensees. Foreclosure consultants must also be bonded and registered with the California Department of Justice (and submit advertising and promotional materials) and the homeowner must be provided with written proof that the consultant’s representative has a valid California real estate sales license, and is bonded in an amount equal to at least twice the fair market value of the property in question. If the foreclosure consultant performs any activities which include negotiating loans or performing services in connection with real property loans, the consultant must also be a real estate licensee.

 

While real estate agents are in some respects exempt from the foreclosure consultant regulations contained in Civil Code Section 2945, they are subject to it’s regulations under certain circumstances and it is in those circumstances that a real estate agent can be in violation of the Act. If they collect fees once a Notice of Default has been recorded, if they collect advance fees before acts have been performed, if they acquire an interest in a residence in foreclosure, if they assist the owner in obtaining the remaining proceeds from the foreclosure sale, or if they make a direct loan for a residence in foreclosure, they may be in violation of the foreclosure consultant laws.

 

A real estate broker cannot collect an advance fee under California Business and Professions Code Section 10026 unless the broker has submitted to the California Department of Real Estate an advance fee agreement for approval.

 

A loan modification contract, even one with a licensed real estate broker, for their assistance in working out a loan modification or negotiating another resolution of your problem must still state what services will be performed, when they will be performed and exactly how much you must pay. If the fees are to be collected in advance, the contract must be pre-approved by the Department of Real Estate.

 

At the Law Offices of Sebastian Gibson, we specialize in the field of real estate and stand ready to assist you if you have been the victim of any type of real estate scam. If you have lost money or your house to a foreclosure consultant or loan modification service as a result of their wrongdoing, we can assist you in pursuing the parties who victimized you and in some instances, we may be able to seek not only any moneys paid to them, but also, in some cases, your other actual damages, equitable relief, reasonable attorney’s fees and costs and punitive damages of three times the compensation received or misapplied by the foreclosure consultant or loan modification service who contracted with you.

 

If you have a business or real estate legal matter in Palm Springs or Palm Desert, in Ontario or Rancho Cucamonga, Temecula or Murrieta, Newport Beach or Huntington Beach, Anaheim or Santa Ana, El Cajon or Carlsbad, Palmdale or Victorville, Long Beach or Santa Monica, Ventura or Oxnard, or anywhere in Southern California, our Palm Springs, San Diego, Orange County, Inland Empire, Los Angeles, Santa Barbara and San Luis Obispo law firm has the knowledge and resources to be your Business Lawyers and Real Estate Attorneys. If you’ve been the victim of a real estate, business, loan modification or foreclosure scam or fraud, be sure to hire a law firm with experience in loan modification, foreclosure and real estate fraud in California and who will endeavor to ensure that your rights are properly represented.

 

To learn more about the statutes which regulate loan modification and foreclosure consultants, or for legal representation, call the Law Offices of R. Sebastian Gibson at any of the numbers on our website at http://www.SebastianGibsonLaw.com .

The Sebastian Gibson Law Firm serves all of San Diego, Orange County, the Inland Empire, Los Angeles, Santa Barbara, San Luis Obispo, Riverside County, San Bernardino County, the Imperial Valley, the Central Coast and all of Southern California. We stand ready to assist you with any type of Business or Real Estate matter, Personal Injury, Auto, Truck, Motorcycle, Pedestrian, Bicycle and Car Accidents, Brain Damage, Catastrophic Injuries, Wrongful Death, Landlord Tenant issues, Homeowner Association matters, Construction, Trademarks, Patents, Corporations, Entertainment, Sports Law, Marketing, Advertising, Media, and Copyright Law. Sebastian Gibson is both an attorney and a Realtor in California with over 30 years of legal experience.

Visit our website at http://www.sebastiangibsonlaw.com if you have a civil legal matter of any kind. We have the knowledge and resources to represent you as your California Loan Modification Lawyer and California Foreclosure Attorney for any losses you may have sustained as a result of real estate fraud, loan modification scams, foreclosure consultant violations, as well as for Environmental and Toxic Tort Law, Litigation, International, Shipping and Maritime Law, Employment, Election and Campaign Finance Law, Consumer Law and Class Actions, Constitutional, Publishing, Publicity, Privacy Rights, Internet Law, Advertising and Media Law, Food and Wine Law, Hotel and Restaurant Law, Estate Planning, Wills and Trusts, Water, Agricultural and Natural Resource Law, Insurance Law, Bad Faith and Psychiatrist and Psychotherapist Defense, Education Law and all types of Personal Injury Accidents.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
Comments (0)

San Diego Foreclosures For Sale

Never have there been so many tools for San Diego employment lawyers to help people recently fired to win damages for discrimination, to seek a better severance package, including not only a longer period of pay benefits, but also other items, most important of which can be a longer period of health insurance benefits following the termination, or even to save the employee’s job.

If you’ve been fired from your job as a result of discrimination or retaliation, been harassed or the victim of a hostile work environment, or paid less than a person of the opposite sex for the same work for no other valid reason, visit our website at http://www.CaliforniaAttorneysLawyers.com and call us at any of the numbers easily found on our website.

In San Diego and throughout California where private employers and government offices have laid off people in the hundreds and thousands, sometimes on a weekly basis there is substantial fear among those who have recently been terminated and those who are in fear that they could be next to be let go. In areas such as the San Diego area where unemployment and foreclosures are at their highest in the state, many employees who have been discriminated against or fired in retaliation for complaints of harassment and who previously feared making any complaint, now feel they have nothing to lose.

Some employees are filing class action lawsuits based on everything from age and sex discrimination to discrimination against veterans. Individual claims are being made for overtime pay that the employees never received and retaliation for whistle blowing or reporting harassment.

One of the best tools for San Diego employment lawyers is often the employee’s company manual and other memos of the company which often lay out glowing descriptions of how fair the company will be in their employment practices. Such manuals often describe all of the types of actions which the company claims they will not tolerate including the various forms of harassment and how the company will never take a retaliatory action against anyone blowing the whistle on harassment at the company.

Such manuals provide a powerful tool to the employee and the employment lawyer to show the company exactly how they violated not only the law, but also the company’s own employment guidelines. Faced with such violations of the principles the company itself laid down and promised to their employees, it is difficult for such companies to argue that they didn’t realize how they were supposed to respond to an employee’s reports of harassment or that they didn’t know they couldn’t fire someone for making such reports.

Employees must keep in mind that under California law, complaints alleging discrimination or retaliation must be filed with the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement in California within six months of the alleged discriminatory or retaliatory action by an employer, except in certain circumstances.

Some of the laws enforced by the Labor Commissioner in the State of California which prohibit discrimination and retaliation include discrimination or retaliation for threatening to file a complaint with the Labor Commissioner, for taking time off to serve as a juror, be a witness in court or to attend judicial proceedings related to being a victim of a crime or related to a victim, for discharging victims of domestic violence, for taking time off to seek medical or psychological treatment related to domestic violence or a sexual assault, for taking time off to go to a child’s school at the request of a teacher, for disclosing his or her wages, for engaging in political activity, for being a whistle blower (not the real whistles), for being paid less than employees of a different sex for the same work unless based on a bona fide factor other than sex, or for complaining about safety or health conditions.

For San Diego Employment Lawyers such as myself who are also Women’s Rights Lawyers, when President Obama signed the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009 in late January, he remedied a great injustice and provided employment and women’s rights attorneys with yet another tool in our arsenal to fight for employee’s and women’s rights.

Now women in California and the rest of the nation have a law that gives them the ability to redress the wrong suffered upon them by society in allowing men to receive more money for the same work from an employer and limiting the rights of women to bring a claim for pay discrimination.

In the past, women were required to file suit within 180 days after first being paid unfairly, even if the discrimination of being paid less than male workers in the same jobs continued. And if a woman failed to discover that male workers were being paid more for the same work, a woman still could not hold her employer accountable if she didn’t learn of the unfairness and take action within 180 days of first being paid the lesser rate.

Under the Fair Pay Act of 2009 signed into law by President Obama, the statute of limitations of 180 days starts with each discriminatory paycheck, rather than when the employer starts to discriminate. So long as a woman in CA files her claim within 180 days of receiving any discriminatory paycheck, not just the first one, she is considered timely in bringing her claim.

An important aspect of the Act is that the effective date of the Act is retroactively set at May 28, 2007, which will allow it to apply to all compensation discrimination claims that have been filed on or after that date.

Women can sue for back pay awards for up to two years before she files her employment discrimination claim under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The Fair Pay Act of 2009 does not change the two-year back pay limit.

Under the Act, an unlawful practice occurs when a discriminatory compensation decision or other practice is adopted, when a person becomes subject to the decision or practice, or when a person is affected by the decision or practice, including each time wages, benefits or other compensation is paid.

California also has it’s own version of the Federal WARN Act which in certain circumstances requires 60 days warning before laying off workers. Under the 2003 California version of the Act, the requirement of 60 days warning applies to establishments with 75 or more employees who have been employed for at least 6 of the previous 12 months, who layoff or relocated 50 or more employees within a 30-day period. There are also various exceptions to the rule.

For the elderly employee laid off, an important ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court has given added protection to older workers. Elderly persons who file employment discrimination lawsuits no longer need to prove that an employer acted intentionally. It is enough that the employee can prove that the layoffs had a disparate effect on the elderly workers.

Layoffs of caregivers providing care to sick family members may also violate federal law.

And all of these tools are still in addition to the tools San Diego employment lawyers have against employers who practice discrimination based on sex, religion, race, age, or sexual orientation, or who subject their workers to a workplace that constitutes a hostile environment.

Visit our website at http://www.CaliforniaAttorneysLawyers.com and call us if you have been discriminated against or are the victim of retaliation by an employer in San Diego or if you have been receiving less pay than a person of the opposite sex for the same work by your employer for no other valid reason.

It is thus imperative that an employee being laid off who is provided with a separation agreement and release of all claims against his employer consult with an employment attorney to determine if there weren’t violations of any of these laws and others that can assist the employee and his or her attorney to negotiate a larger severance package.

If you have recently been fired, are in fear of losing your job or if you have been presented with a separation agreement or severance package and have been discriminated against, harassed or are the victim of retaliation in San Diego by your employer, we invite you to call our office.

Visit our website at http://www.CaliforniaAttorneysLawyers.com if you are the victim of employment discrimination, retaliation or of discriminatory compensation in California. We have the knowledge and resources to be your San Diego Employment Lawyer and San Diego Employment Attorney anywhere in Southern California from San Diego to Orange County, and Santa Barbara to Palm Springs and all points in between, including Long Beach, Huntington Beach, Anaheim, Ventura, Newport Beach, San Luis Obispo, Oceanside, Santa Ana, Riverside, Ontario and Palm Desert.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
Comments (0)
Sep
27

Legal Defenses to Foreclosure

Posted by: admin | Comments (0)

San Diego Foreclosures For Sale

The following are legal defenses to foreclosure to beat the bank:

 1.       Truth in Lending Act (TILA) violations enabling rescission.  If your loan is a refinance, the bank must have provided you a set of disclosures at the time of closing.  If these disclosures are inaccurate, the loan is statutorily rescindable under TILA.  For example, in a foreclosure action, the finance charge must have been accurate within $35 or the loan may be rescindable.  This means the loan is cancelled and all money paid to the lender is refunded.   

2.       Truth in Lending Act (TILA) violations enabling damages.  If you purchased the property  with the loan or used the proceeds to refinance and proper disclosures were not given, then you may be entitled to money damages to offset the foreclosure.

3.       Home Ownership and Equity Protection Act (HOEPA).  This is a very powerful federal law governing high cost refinance loans.  If your loan is under $150,000 or the initial rate was above 8%, you should evaluate your loan for violations of this act.  Violations here enable rescission and substantial money damages that can be in excess of the loan’s dollar amount.

4.       Failure to Provide a Correct Notice of the Right to Rescind.  There is a specific notice that must be provided to refinance customers at closing.  If this form is inaccurate or incorrect, the loan is rescindable up to three years after the closing date. 

5.       Breach of Contract.  Many times the lender will do things that are unfair or unjustified before starting the foreclosure process.  Just as you have an obligation to pay the mortgage, the lender has a responsibility not to interfere with your ability to do so – like force placing insurance making the payments substantially more expensive than they should have been.

6.       Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act.  This federal law governs many types of disclosures that lenders must provide at the time of closing, in addition to prohibiting things like kickbacks and unearned fees.  It enables damages, and sometimes rescission if the error triggers TILA.

7.       Fair Debt Collection Practices Act.  This federal law requires servicers or lenders who obtain the mortgage after default follow specific protocol in attempting to collect on the debt.  A failure to follow this law enables statutory damages and attorney’s fees.

8.       Fair Credit Reporting Act.  This federal law governs lenders ability to report information about the mortgage and requires the accurate reporting of negative information.  Violations of this act also enables damages and attorney’s fees.  Punitive damages might be available under this act.

9.       Real party in interest.  This is a procedural defense to foreclosure that can be extremely effective at stopping the lender’s ability to foreclose.  It essentially questions the ownership of the mortgage and questions whether the foreclosing party is, in fact, the holder of the mortgage and note.

10.   Unconscionability.  This defense is focused on the events surrounding the creation and closing of the mortgage loan.  A violation here gives the court great leeway in deciding whether the mortgage should be voided or changed.

11.   Failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.  This general defense attacks the lender’s ability to foreclose and is can be used in conjunction with one of the other foreclosure defenses.

12.   Failure to establish conditions precedent.  Want to get a foreclosure action thrown out of court right away?  Use this defense that attacks the lender’s pre-foreclosure processes.

13.   Failure to comply with FHA pre-foreclosure requirements.  FHA requires every lender to mail a booklet called “How to Avoid Foreclosure” and set up a face-to-face meeting with the borrower before foreclosing (in most cases).  If the lender does not take these steps, then it cannot foreclose.

The author of 23 Legal Defenses to Foreclosure has identified over 50 legal defenses to foreclosure (23 with detailed explanations), which are listed in his book. For more information about each of the defenses above, consider the book, 23 Legal Defenses to Foreclosure, by

clicking here.
The book includes checklists and easy-to-read chapters that show you how to identify these errors in your own loan.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
Comments (0)